Critique On The Resurrection Of Christ Theological...

Critique In our second article critique we have to critique an article about â€Å"The Resurrection of Christ: Theological Implications† written by Daniel B. Wallace. Before getting to the content in this article we must first talk some about the author. Daniel B. Wallace has taught Greek and New Testament courses on a graduate school level since 1979. He has a Ph.D. from Dallas Theological Seminary, and is currently professor of New Testament Studies at his alma mater. His Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament (Zondervan, 1996) has become a standard textbook in colleges and seminaries. He is the senior New Testament editor of the NET Bible. Dr. Wallace is also the Executive Director for the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts. In this article by Dr. Wallace he says that a number of Christians feel that their gospel presentations should include simply the fact of Christ’s death, but not his resurrection. some go so fa r as to have a crucifix in their homes or around their necks with a corpse hanging on it. Certainly such a picture elicits remorse and pity. But does it offer hope? Does it suggest that sins are forgiven, or just that they are the cause of such a vile punishment, of the innocent dying in the place of the wicked? He started his brief study by taking a quick look at the resurrection in the Old Testament, followed by the resurrection of Christ in early Christian preaching. Dr.